How much more can France take before it spirals into hatred?

From the Independentnice-attack-23

Why has France become such a persistent target for jihadist assault? There is a temptation, both inside and outside the country to suggest that France, and successive French governments, may be partly to blame. This hides a darker reality. The truck attack which slaughtered 84 people in Nice was the third mass killing in France in 17 months. There have also been a cluster of other, “smaller” incidents which were broadly jihadist in nature.

Source: How much more can France take before it spirals into hatred?

On the evening of Bastille day celebrations a driver of a trunk mowed down and killed 84 people with more in a sever state. Violence and the apparent Jihadist threat remains.

The reaction of the French government is more of the same. The state of emergency has been extended and more aeroplanes have been sent to bomb Syria some more. This was after the day before Francois Hollande had announced that the state of emergency would end by the end of July. So a reflex reaction for which there is some discussion regarding the effectiveness of this approach.

From the Guardian:

4876

There has been an admission from the prime minister of France that terrorism is here to stay and if I understand correctly that there are no simple solutions.

The Guardian gives a potted reasoning for why France is so targeted. Some of the explanation relates to local French problems and social exclusion. A more appropriate approach to find solutions?

 

Silver Wedding

Today marks 25 years of marriage. A remarkable thing to write really.

Memories of the M4, St. Margaret’s Road Southall and the trip to New York and New England.

The big celebration is the long trip to Canada in August plus the week long weekend to the ‘Rap” in two weeks.

Tonight we went to Boulcott Bistro for dinner. A nice evening- Sara chose better than me.

A bouquet of flowers sent to work too- so many things this time!

Conversation with a Brexiter

Via Whatsapp I had a conversation with MM today. He voted out and is pleased with the result.

His argument is that the EU is a failed programme and it is better to take your chance, leave and be optimistic regarding the outcome. Struck me as happy to gamble. Well for some people, who are in a good state in life and so are resilient to the potential adverse outcomes of the gamble that is likely to be OK. However all things are not equal in the UK and there are plenty of people who are already struggling, who were sucked into voting out, who do not have the resilience for when things turn out badly and are more likely to be on the end of the adverse effects anyway.

So there is a group of Brexiters who are happy to follow their doctrine because they are safe if things turn out badly. Reminds me of Peter Q in years gone by who was happy with the prospect of the socialist state even if quality of life was impaired by the change.

There is no plan, risks are not important,only opportunity and I’m ok Jack.

 

David Cameron resigns after UK votes to leave European Union | Politics | The Guardian

PM announces resignation following victory for leave supporters after divisive referendum campaign

Source: David Cameron resigns after UK votes to leave European Union | Politics | The Guardian

To be expected and deserved that he resigned.

What a political error. As PM he almost lost Scotland and now will go down as the man who unexpectedly took UK out of EU.

The face of the Etonian elite who have lead the country to uncertainty and possible chaos.

The Count in process

Live

EU referendum results live: Brexit most likely outcome says leading pollster

from the Telegraph live feed.

Results seem to be showing narrower wins for Stay or larger or unexpected wins for Leave.

Working class/Labour areas so far, more for Brexit.

Looks increasingly depressing.