Surveillance – A Few Quirkes https://afewquirkes.org A record of wanderings Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:42:11 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 Secure Messaging https://afewquirkes.org/2021/01/15/secure-messaging/ Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:42:11 +0000 http://afewquirkes.org/?p=3793 Continue reading "Secure Messaging"]]>

For those wondering about @SignalApp's scaling, #WhatsApp's decision to sell out its users to @Facebook has led to what is probably the biggest digital migration to a more secure messenger we've ever seen. Hang in there while the Signal team catches up. https://t.co/xNKz4aYUFJ

— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) January 15, 2021

WhatsApp recently announced that there will be closer data sharing with Facebook. So people are now responding and joining the Signal side- my concerns are now more widely accepted

]]> Surveillance https://afewquirkes.org/2016/06/07/surveillance/ Tue, 07 Jun 2016 06:03:16 +0000 http://afewquirkes.org/?p=2317

Skeptical? I once believed NSA wouldn’t ignore constitutional complaints. Then I heard this: (CC: @Thomas_Drake1)https://t.co/weCMMLAVS9

— Edward Snowden (@Snowden) June 5, 2016

]]> Nobody cares about their online privacy… until it’s gone | Comment is free | The Guardian https://afewquirkes.org/2015/03/02/nobody-cares-about-their-online-privacy-until-its-gone-comment-is-free-the-guardian/ Mon, 02 Mar 2015 07:21:08 +0000 http://afewquirkes.org/?p=1640 Continue reading "Nobody cares about their online privacy… until it’s gone | Comment is free | The Guardian"]]> Nobody cares about their online privacy… until it’s gone | Comment is free | The Guardian.

 

I read John Naughton’s blog and column regularly and always enjoy his thoughts and his links to other writers.

Regarding the whole provicy issue and the mantra of the powerful “if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to worry about”. I like the following:

In that sense, they (Rifkind and Straw) are in the same boat as most citizens. We all do harmless or foolish things that we nevertheless regard as private matters that are none of the government’s (or anybody else’s) business. That’s what privacy is all about.

]]> ‘Civil liberties? They’re safe.’ And if you believe that… | Technology | The Observer https://afewquirkes.org/2012/04/08/civil-liberties-theyre-safe-and-if-you-believe-that-technology-the-observer/ https://afewquirkes.org/2012/04/08/civil-liberties-theyre-safe-and-if-you-believe-that-technology-the-observer/#respond Sun, 08 Apr 2012 10:13:00 +0000 http://quirketimes.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/civil-liberties-theyre-safe-and-if-you-believe-that-technology-the-observer/ Continue reading "‘Civil liberties? They’re safe.’ And if you believe that… | Technology | The Observer"]]> ‘Civil liberties? They’re safe.’ And if you believe that… | Technology | The Observer: My hunch is that the proposals were an attempt by the security services to slip one over politicians by selling them to senior officials in the Home Office, who, like their counterparts across the civil service, know sweet FA about technology and are liable to believe 10 implausible assertions before breakfast. In that sense, the Home Office has been “captured” by GCHQ and MI5 much as the health department has been captured by consultancy companies flogging ludicrous ICT projects.

Love the analogy

]]> https://afewquirkes.org/2012/04/08/civil-liberties-theyre-safe-and-if-you-believe-that-technology-the-observer/feed/ 0